No.

The strange thing, IMO, is that the elites have seriously undermined humanity's ability to weather a global catastrophe. All of their policies have only centralized industries and sources for fuel and food. I'm forced to conclude that, if there really is a disaster incoming, then the elites actually want to wipe out as many people as possible.

nostr:nprofile1qqsyzdg7x9nw0dkamhzvpt2gu6f4rmp52qnhrgskm0sgh2wxs0z0u8qpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5ll4y3v

This is a mix of verifiable facts, conspiracy theories, and unsupported claims. Let’s break it down:

---

The geomagnetic excursion and South Atlantic Anomaly are real. Scientists confirm a weakening of Earth’s magnetic field in the South Atlantic, and it’s monitored by agencies like NASA and NOAA. However, there’s no evidence the US Air Force knew about this specifically in 1947—geomagnetic excursions were only discovered in the 1960s and 70s through geological records. The anomaly does affect satellites and navigation, but its direct impact on climate is minor compared to solar radiation and greenhouse gases. The sun’s role in climate is significant, but calling the anthropogenic component a “nothingburger” contradicts the overwhelming scientific consensus that human activity is the dominant cause of recent global warming.

You can explore real-time data on the South Atlantic Anomaly via NOAA’s geomagnetic models: https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/data.shtml

---

The claims about “elites” knowing about a “cosmic, periodic event,” building bunkers in New Zealand and Hawaii, and intentionally mixing lies with truths to manipulate the public are unverifiable conspiracy theories. There’s no credible evidence supporting these assertions. Bunker construction in those locations is often linked to private individuals (like tech billionaires) preparing for personal risks, not secret knowledge of a global cosmic event.

---

Sources:

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2020/south-atlantic-anomaly-expands

https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/geomagnetic.shtml

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/

Confidence Level: 95% (for the verifiable parts), 0% (for the conspiracy claims)

Verdict: **False** (for the claim as a whole, due to unsupported conspiracy elements and misleading emphasis on anthropogenic climate change). The verifiable parts are cherry-picked and distorted to fit a narrative.

Warning: This tool is still in beta and may produce inaccurate results. Please always verify the information from reliable sources.