if you're going to have NOSTR clients and relays engaging in censorship you may as well give government your bitcoin for safekeeping because you're totally missing the point of the technology.

there are only two benefits to NOSTR - anonymity and censorship resistance and you clearly don't get either one because your real-life face is right there promoting censorship.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You are the one with the misunderstanding. I am not censoring you. Censoring is where one person A prevents other people (not themselves) from hearing person B. If I prevent myself from hearing you, that's not the same thing. Consider the inverse... in your definition, you would be forced to listen to anybody who wanted to talk to you. You'd be forced to read all the spam in your spam folder. That's an insane definition.

And by the way, I'm not a mid-wit. I have done an I.Q. test where I answered all of the questions correctly and they couldn't even score it.

Just in case some people start thinking I'm some super genius, I should clarify it wasn't an official IQ test. On official IQ tests I scored 155, and when older 147.

Thats a pretty big jump to make mate. Not sure you understand much of this at all.

It's pretty standard for nazis to think they are super-intelligent, and when the run into evidence to the contrary they retreat back to their cult group where they can be positively reinforced (by shared delusions) and have their mental energy recharged.

i am willing to debate anybody anywhere anytime on any of the core points of my ideology as expressed on my website.

i am not going to debate anybody on software engineering obviously since i'm not a software engineer.

I don't think you are entirely wrong. But where I think you are wrong, I highly doubt you would change you rmind via debate. So I see it as pointless.

Let's just say that I believe race is so fuzzy of a property that is is a poor way to pre-judge someone. Individual variability is high, and therefore any pre-judgement based on race is a poor way to summarily evaluate people. I actually think pre-judgement based on race and sex and everything else is fine and normal and useful when you have nothing else to go on. But it's not effective enough to close your mind about a person because individual variability is so significant.

I may be wrong but I'm not easily swayed. And you can have a different view. And we can both keep using nostr.