This is my point:

nostr:nevent1qqs2nhwxavzn0ud9p9hrsclnm2fvefxetcjh3zt5n2d9f6xhmu2n5qcpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcpr9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucm9wf3kzarjdamxztndv5jlwd7p

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I understand so you mean we should have different names for different sizes of transactions according to the amount of ceros?

I think we should just have one name for a reasonable amount of value and I neither think 100k $ or more is reasonable, nor do I think that a reasonable amount should be called sats, bits or anything else no one cares about.