Nostr Web Client

this is why we can't have more people charging for relays

how do we know the implementation is even secure anyway?

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq0vy9tlv6h3f8u5tvcnexdcy50acec2n42ga0y9tz8m2w5k5ffpdqythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tcqyq6jp55hq0hwy2x775kxe440m297ypgcqjdhrr2wzg6f9dnpmt2uk4gs8r9

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

i mean for users not the fucking relay operator

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

and actually, my bigger gripe is that this means that gating access to privileged data between parties like DMs and application specific data continues to be an easily abused surveillance vector

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

and i don't want to hear about how simplex solves this because it doesn't

that's cope

Account Deleted 1y ago

What are you on about? We know it is secure because the relays are not trusted third parties.

Everything is public in nostr except DMs, which a e2ee. And everything is signed, so the relays can't do anything more than just not relay messages.