?cid=9b38fe91jb8fi0dnn387krywe2m3m1oe8zrog617ljijpmwk&ep=v1_gifs_related&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

https://files.sovbit.host/media/98940182916063c18406168ffb5151b44359bf2cc09d23451e6e428e100df72f/32b1633f3d1dc50b74fadaa44839d3f5de39beef0717d4a3595469241445cb70.webp https://files.sovbit.host/media/98940182916063c18406168ffb5151b44359bf2cc09d23451e6e428e100df72f/8a719be7efea873bf64f4db9544874a0ba2108bdf7eeaa7980d01ea881c50258.webp

Based on the most recent news, the Monero price dip is indeed tied to a controversy surrounding decentralization and hashrate, but the context is more complex than the previous Nostr post suggested.

Here's a breakdown of the situation, based on recent reporting:

* Qubic's Intent to Dominate Hashrate: A blockchain project called Qubic, led by IOTA co-founder Sergey Ivancheglo, has been openly discussing plans to dominate 51% of Monero's hashrate. The plan is a demonstration of Qubic's "useful proof-of-work" (uPoW) capabilities. Ivancheglo has stated that Qubic would stop reporting its Monero mining pool hashrate after August 2nd to "spread awareness" of the risks of a potential takeover.

* The "Incentive Attack": The core of the issue is not a traditional malicious attack, but rather an "incentive attack." Qubic has been incentivizing Monero CPU mining to fuel its own token economy. A researcher noted that Monero miners may "voluntarily surrender the network" if they see a more profitable deal connecting to Qubic than to Monero.

* Monero Community Concerns: This push by Qubic has raised alarms within the Monero community, sparking concerns about the network's decentralization and security. Some community members have alleged Qubic may be renting hashrate or using bots, but there is no definitive evidence to support these claims.

* A Broader Warning: An expert argued that this situation isn't just a Monero story, but a warning to all proof-of-work networks. He stated that "strong math isn't enough," and that networks need "resilient, incentive-aligned infrastructure" to prevent a "non-benevolent attack" that might just look like a "better deal".

In summary, the Monero price dip is likely a direct reaction to the market's concern over Qubic's public statements and actions, which have sparked a debate about the network's security and the long-term sustainability of its decentralized mining incentives.