I’ve been reading through the pull requests in the nips repo related to nip-32 and I can def sympathize with concerns by #[3], #[4] and others, particularly here: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/457, regarding defined vocabularies. We need them, but they are awful in so many ways. I may add some of my thoughts over there, but while the thought occurs to me I wanted to wonder out loud whether crowdsourcing a NIP-32 namespace — which is basically a defined vocabulary, if I am understanding correctly (and I may not be) — might be a potential application of (and potential way to test out the feasibility of) loose consensus using DCoSL.