World War II was the struggle between Europe (Germany), the new Anglo-Saxon empire (USA) and the Communists (USSR).

Europe lost that war, and since then has been subjugated to US interests.

Much is said about the Holocaust but many more Germans (more than 10 million, some historians say more than 15 million) civilians died at the hands of the Allies than Jews (if we take into account the official figures of the Holocaust which are false), the German civilian population has been the great forgotten of the history written by the victors.

From 1945 until now, Europe has been subjected to a brutal propaganda campaign by the Anglo-Saxons distorting most of the facts of the Second World War. And on the other hand, everything possible has been done to plunge Germany, the engine of Europe, into misery, and they have succeeded, they are now energy dependent and have put an end to their industry.

If you want to know a curious fact from a history fanatic, the US has followed exactly the same tactic with Putin as with Hitler, harassing him to provoke World War III, but they did not count on the fact that Putin is also a history fanatic.

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Hitler invaded Poland to save German minorities that were being brutalized and raped, Putin same thing in Ukraine.

True, although from here is where I think Putin has learned his lesson and has played a war of attrition and put up with the provocations, which have been many.

Yes and Putin is a smarter dictator than Hitler. He will not invade Europe like Hitler invaded urss

Just to clarify that they are all dictators, Europe is not better than Russia, the current democracy is a fallacy.

All politicians are the same shit, I do not defend Putin or Hitler, but I do not see it fair to defend the opposite side when they are the same.

Isn't the USA a dictatorship that conquers other countries and subjugates them to its interests?

The usa is the empire that won, but it's the worst nightmare even for the founding fathers:

"God forbid that we should ever be so miserable as to sink into a Republic.” 6 One of the Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton, perhaps the most gifted of them all, regretted that the United States could not become a monarchy. Van Buren saw in Hamilton a monarchist, 7 certainly a conviction well grounded in facts 8 in view of Hamilton’s speeches at the Federal Convention in 1787 and 1788 in New York. And Francis Lieber very rightly pointed out that the Declaration of Independence is not really an antimonarchical document. 9 The sentence, “A prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people” merely condemns George III but, at the same time, voices great respect for the royal office. The average American today would be surprised to hear the term “ruler of a free people” in which he sees a contradictio in adjecto. But in formulations like these we perceive a few aspects of Jefferson’s highly contradictory character and mind. He does stand near the mainstream of American leftist thought and deserved Hamilton’s severe strictures. 10 But then he was also the man who, in a letter to Mann Page, spoke about the “swinish multitudes.” 11 And Gouverneur Morris, on the extreme right, wrote to Nathanael Green in 1781, “I will go farther, I have no hope that our Union can subsist except in the form of an absolute monarchy.”

Of the American founders, Alexander Hamil-

ton was a monarchist. Likewise, the Governor of Pennsylvania, Robert Morris, had

strong monarchist leanings. George Washington expressed his profound distaste of

democracy in a letter of September 30,1798, to James McHenry. John Adams was

convinced that every society grows aristocrats as inevitably as a field of corn will

grow some large ears and some small. In a letter to John Taylor he insisted, like Plato

and Aristotle, that democracy would ultimately evolve into despotism, and in a

letter to Jefferson he declared that "democracy will envy all, contend with all, en-

deavor to pull down all, and when by chance it happens to get the upper hand for a

short time, it will be revengeful, bloody and cruel." James Madison, in a letter to

Jared Parks, complained of the difficulty "of protecting the rights of property

against the spirit of democracy." And even Thomas Jefferson, probably the most

"democratic" of the Founders, confessed in a letter to John Adams that he consid-

ered

the natural aristocracy .. . as the most precious gift of nature, for the

instruction, the trusts and governments of society. And indeed, it would

have been inconsistent in creation to have formed men for the social state,

and not have provided virtue and wisdom enough to manage the concerns

of society. May we not even say that that form of government is best, which

provides most effectually for a pure selection of these natural aristoi into the

offices of government?

Characterizing the general attitude of the founders, then, the most appropriate pro-

nouncement is that of John Randolph of Roanoke: "I am an aristocrat: I love liberty, I

hate equality."

Russians killing ukrainians (golodomor) > ukrainians cleansing from polish > polish cleansing from germans, same as czechs > germans, romanians and so on it was a terrible time in Europe

Indeed

When I got to the part about German civilians I stopped reading and skimmed the rest to see if you had a point

I hope more American "civilians" die in world war 3 but dying to other people's weapons is strange to call "being killed" after provoking it by refusing to stop attempting genocide

the allies targeted civilians. All German metropolises were destroyed in gigantic fire storms while the people were living there. At a time when the German army was already crushed and not capable of air defense anymore.

There are no civilians in Nazi America. I have no proof there were any civilians in Nazi Germany.

"Man jumps off building, is killed by pavement"

Sure, pavement killed him technically I guess