Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Vitor Pamplona

For those saying that the receiver can always screenshot and share in #2, sure. But apps can lead the receiver in the mindset of the sender.

If you receive a simple link, without explanations, you will think it's ok to reshare. The link is public after all.

But if you receive the same link, with a little confidential note attached to it by the UI, you will try to follow your friend's wishes.

Remember, most DMs are between people that know each other and want to sustain a good relationship.

It's not about making it mathematically impossible to reshare.

nostr:nevent1qqsdwz0a6xm0vek0rzwdk09q6whzm3yulu2wwgeat5ms6sxp87as9tcpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsygzxpsj7dqha57pjk5k37gkn6g4nzakewtmqmnwryyhd3jfwlpgxtspsgqqqrvusfjq94p

Avatar
brugeman 2y ago

Screenshot's validity cannot be verified. While an encrypted signed note is 100% proof that one did in fact send this message.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
brugeman 2y ago

UNencrypted, of course

Thread collapsed
Avatar
Gustavo 2y ago

Exactly. If the resharing makes a copy of the original image but with, let's say, few pixel changes or small encoding changes and no original metadata, then it's OK to me

Thread collapsed