Where do you believe this “right” is derived from?
Discussion
what part of “permissionless” do you not understand?
Permissionless and a right aren’t the same thing. You seem to not understand my question. Sorry if you got triggered by your own words.
there is no right; there are no rulers to bestow rights unto the users of open-source software
sorry if you misunderstood bitcoin
I didn’t misunderstand you being a retard with you words. First it’s a right then it’s not. Calling anything permissionless they requires change In core code is also retard. I was actually trying to get to an intelligent conversation but you’re hell bent In showing how far left of the bell curve you are. 🫡
anyone willing to pay to put spam on the blockchain can do so at their own discretion - period; I can’t presume to know what’s right or wrong, as no-one should suppose to do so
it is a right, but not granted by anyone
run core; run knots; run *an* iteration - it does not matter
It’s absolutely a permission granted by core devs. I honestly thought that was the point you were trying to make but obviously not. Anything that makes it harder for new users to run a node shouldn’t be ignored. Core and knots both have their issues, we need more options and non retarded users who don’t ignore attack vectors. You are actually make the exact same argument as csw but don’t seem to realize it, or you’re just as fucked up. Not really sure at this point
Looks to me like he doesn't want to understand.
I tend to agree first it’s a right, then it’s not. Then I don’t understand bitcoin. Now he’s too dumb to have an opinion on what anyone does with bitcoin. More a circle jerk than a discussion.
Its not a right. Here I just got finished tapping this out :