The definition of a soft fork is a further constraint. A narrowing of the consensus rules. The definition of a hard fork is relaxing a constraint. A broadening of the rules.

So expanding the main block size limit (Satoshi’s 1MB limit) is a hard fork because it relaxes the limit. Unupgraded nodes would NOT accept the new, larger blocks. It’s a hard fork because everyone must upgrade, or be left behind.

By contrast, reducing the block size is a soft fork. Unupgraded nodes will accept the new, smaller blocks just fine. It’s backwards compatible. People can opt to run old software and continue to use Bitcoin.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You're right, I was using hard fork & chainsplit interchangeably.

Thanks for the lesson 👍

No worries. You’re right that you can get a chain split in both cases. Soft forks are not without risk.