100%, nostr:nprofile1qqsvq6dm2x2fhwdmehcah58a0ux2f20fzra2gyxrtyvefvs29lc6sxspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qthhq45

We can make observations and draw conclusions as to what they mean ("hypothesis").

If our hypothesis stops making sense after we make a new, repeatable observation ("fire can burn some metals, and metals are not alive"), then we think and ask around until we have a new hypothesis that fits all our observations.

If somebody feels that the putative "Big Bang" cannot be seen, and the hypothesis is therefore in need of replacement, then I would ask them to observe the Cosmic Microwave Background.

The "Big Bang" can, in fact, still be seen, just not with the naked eye.

Then God can been seen too in the natural world, and the observation of the evidence, and the conclusions drawn therefrom, are no less real than deriving "big bang" from "background radiation."

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Indeed.

Globally, most educated people believe in both God, and in physics.