I don't really use the word "government" imternally but the American military industrial complex and its associated global deep state have a million little pieces and they are one unit controlling most of the territory on earth

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Shit dude, if you don't use the word government then forget this entire conversation. Dismissing the question on semantic grounds is 100% valid and I respect it.

Do you consider yourself an anarchist?

Eugh, it's late so I've got to turn off my phone. If you answer I'll read it in the morning.

Sleep well 🤙

I consider myself an anarchist on the basis that up until deep fakes got too close to good, I figured we should just defund the police and make everyone wear body cameras and put security cameras everywhere and generally make it impossible to shoot anyone without justification without creating the justification for someone else to shoot you

Now idk if anarchy is even relevant anymore or if the world is just gonna collapse into AI driven chaos for the foreseeable future regardless of human ideology

Was anarchy relevant back before body cameras and security cameras? Was anarchy relevant back when we had to rely on witness testimony?

Back when there was no global force like the military industrial complex to stop every anarchy, they all stopped and got replaced anyway. Seems people always ended up doing chaos with it and wanting a system to make the chaos stop. I assume if everyone woke up smart one day 10 years ago, after camera phones but before deep fakes, they'd have decided the system isn't needed anymore.

Okay, what if there was a military industrial complex, but no cameras? Would anarchy be relevant in that scenario?

Maybe just the nature of having a dominant force would create a drive for anarchy, in an endless cycle