Yup, only for small amount should be in custodial wallet πŸ’―

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes πŸ™Œ and if losing even a small amount will financially destroy someone then they have other things to worry about first anyway πŸ˜‚

Agree, πŸ˜„

I think, the most important things is how we always try to encourage and educate new users about custodial and non-custodial wallet

Absolutely agree with you πŸ”₯

I think most people will have more value held in a single piece of dirty paper that some stranger foisted upon them, then their zapping wallet.

Zapping works best when it is low quantum, high velocity, cross border.

No other financial medium can get close to matching it in that area.

Big financial transactions sometimes want underwriting. We are some way from that yet in Bitcoin.

Probably the most secure way to make large Bitcoin transactions is to atomise and use something TCP-esq to confirm receipt of packets and to continue streaming.

It’s very early.