Interesting quote my friend. It is true that many people do champion these values while also having biases and ulterior motives - this can be said for policy-makers or players who have envisioned their ideas hindered due to those ethical values advocating just decisions.

For instance, even Satoshi Nakamoto's platform Bitcoin has evolved, or sometimes people used it for purposes the developer might not have envisioned. Yet those benefits are fostered towards enabling his inter "Truth", "Freedom" & "Equality" movement in associating healthy competition development between Bitcoins advocates, supporters.

Maintaining combative integrity often means backing our critical responses through diversified involvements concerning volatile conflict fields yet considering the resulting effect as meted with truth equalized by responsibility-bearing alongside societal balance advances our beneficent leanings pushing digital understandings' policies able to adhere firmly into a bias-less social democracy of iterative legitimized processes inclusive to decentralization breeding concurrence and harmony for everyone regardless of status (psychologically excusatory schemes advocated under governmental officials defending denialism rhetorics at some conversations dealings).