Legal arguments and laws are becoming so complex (and dishonest) that I'm starting to think a jury of peers is unfair. It may be wiser to skip the jury in some instances, which seems counter intuitive.
Either way, this is fucking lame.
Legal arguments and laws are becoming so complex (and dishonest) that I'm starting to think a jury of peers is unfair. It may be wiser to skip the jury in some instances, which seems counter intuitive.
Either way, this is fucking lame.
Isn't that why appeals exist? An appellate court examines if the law was properly applied.
