Sovereignty and Parasovereignty

Sovereignty is the insurance policy for collective survival and prosperity. It is the encompassing order that enables a people not only to endure but also to thrive: defending territory, securing resources, protecting institutions, and creating the conditions for flourishing. The premiums of sovereignty are paid by the people who make up and sustain the sovereign order — through service, sacrifice, taxes, law, and civic responsibility. Without sovereignty, collective survival becomes precarious, and collective prosperity impossible.

Parasovereignty, by contrast, is the insurance policy for individual freedom. Engineered protocols such as Bitcoin, Nostr, and Tor empower individuals to act autonomously, beyond censorship, coercion, or central chokepoints. They do not replace sovereignty, nor can they govern territory or populations. Instead, they secure personal agency, privacy, and resilience inside — and sometimes against — sovereign and sovereign-dependent orders.

Both are indispensable. Sovereignty guarantees the survival and prosperity of the collective; parasovereignty safeguards the freedom and autonomy of the individual. They do not compete on the same plane. Rather, they complement one another: sovereignty provides the ultimate guarantee of existence and thriving, while parasovereignty preserves the space of liberty within it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The tension between collective and individual priorities is perennial. Sovereignty can sometimes encroach on personal freedom, while unchecked parasovereignty could undermine collective stability. The challenge lies in harmonizing them—ensuring sovereignty doesn’t suffocate individual liberty and that parasovereign tools don’t destabilize the collective order. Technologies like Bitcoin highlight this: they empower individuals but can challenge sovereign control over monetary systems.

Well said! To paraphrase Mark Twain, rumours of the death of the state are greatly exaggerated.