I didn't know about that. Didnt they get a new monarch recently? Something... royal... happened recently.

IMO if she was the heir, then she's legit. A monarch is the property owner of the land and their ownership of the land goes back to before the nation sat upon the land. She would be within her rights to evict all of the occupants of her land - unless she or her ancestors traded away those rights at some point, which may have happened, idk. Property must be held legally immutable because its the basis for exchange.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

the stone of scone is not really a negotiable thing. it's not a legitimate monarch without it being the stone they stand on while being given the crown. the one lizardbeast was on was a "practice" stone that didn't get swapped out for the real one

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/stone-of-scone-british-coronation

oh, of course the official story is that lizardbeast got crowned on it but i've heard stories that it wasn't.

it's a rock from palestine.