Would you rather have a nocoiner president or an altcoiner president?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That's a trick question, they are the same thing.

Answer number 3….RFK jr

He makes the most sense to me, but then again I don't vote.

No president at all, thanks. I can govern myself.

Jimmy is trying to pull a fast one on us. The meme with the buttons comes to mind. Or the office meme.

Same same, but different.

nostr:nevent1qqs888zcea9v2xngf37ztgxd6mj28yxgpl3d4gryvgwrecg4mp3eh9gpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qgs8k0mcqd6sw3h524qn5gslszt9am9knmes3uh268dgnnpv3yfwj6qrqsqqqqqp2cf34h

No question … nocoiner. I’d rather them not understand versus being flat out wrong. Altcoiners brings in the worst of fiat

Each has their benefits. Perhaps one that understands Bitcoin is the correct answer.

no coin

An altcoiner is further on their journey to Bitcoin than a nocoiner

I’d rather have no president at all

Rules without rulers

Anarchy

Fuck the government 🤣🤣🤣

Does it matter?

Megan thee stallion

Vice president

Jimmy song for president

Nocoiner. Hands down. He still can learn. An altcoiner will never.

in my experience, most bitcoiners had a shitcoin phase

True! But for a president, I rather have someone with the homework done.

Answer #3….RFK jr

Altcoiner would arguably have a “better” understanding of Bitcoin than no coiner. Therefore arguably help adoption and regulatory side of things over the short / medium term. I would say I’m more fearful of the altcoiner over the long term though… either way I believe both parties are getting orange pilled eventually.

Which ever one is not a grifting douchbag....

If the altcoiner meant primarily privacy coins, absolutely that.

that's a hard one.... but altcoiner

What many maximalists miss is that even the sleaziest of shitcoiners tend to appreciate Bitcoin.

that's what the smart shitcoiners dump their bags for

C. I chose C.

C for no president

C

Neither 🫡

COULD NOT CARE LESS THEY CAN ALL GFT