because Urbanism is the project of the World Economic Forum ( 15 minute cities etc. ) and International Finance Jewry that is behind WEF is also behind Mass Immigration.

https://dissidentsound.discoursehosting.net/c/urbanism/urbanism-explained/88

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

what makes you say i support it though?

because people who are against cars and parking ( Urbanists ) all come out of the same WEF ( World Economic Forum ) pipeline, whether they are willing participants ( paid shill "experts" ) or useful idiots ( college students ).

people in that pipeline are generally also anti-white and pro-immigration.

lately, however, Urbanism has been reaching the pro-white corners of the internet, and i have also written specifically about this tragic development here:

https://dissidentsound.discoursehosting.net/t/urbanists-are-now-on-the-fediverse/918

unfortunately there is no cure for stupidity. not everybody can have top 1% IQ like me.

Cars and Guns are the only things protecting Whites from invading hordes of Sub-Humans.

Either you want White Race to survive or Perish.

If you want it to survive you will be Pro car and Anti Immigration.

If you want White Race to perish you will be anti car and pro immigration.

Is this rocket science to you ? Have you had your IQ measured ?

all the "high IQ" people I have known are jabbed to the max normies. At a population level it correlates with compliance, obedience and stupidity.

Honestly i wouldn't brag about it if i were you

you're thinking 120 IQ not 140 IQ

120 IQ is somebody just smart enough to be a useful idiot. a person with 120 IQ can "believe" and "trust" the science, but can't question it.

140 IQ is when science textbooks look like children's coloring books and you talk down to your professors and everybody else.

That must be incredible!

not at all. it sucks. at least for me.

there are many other factors that go into having a good life like having good parents and a big dick.

and not being autistic, not having narcolepsy and so on.

And when considering another human I don't care about melanin concentration - it's blood group we should be worrying about..

so, thought experiment:

swap a black and a white baby at birth - so the black baby grows up in a white family etc, and vice versa

what do you think about the black person and white person when they're adults?

that's the same as saying swap brother and sister at birth. raise son as a woman and daughter as a man.

so the actual biology matters, you are saying?

yes. but there is also the added element that we can see each other's race, and all races were taught by Jews to hate white people.

Jews will escape to Israel and everybody else will be slaughtered.

what aspect of black people's biology is important here?

their small brain, their low IQ and their poor impulse control.

i don't want to hear anything from you until you read my article below:

https://dissidentsound.discoursehosting.net/t/why-skin-color-is-correlated-with-intelligence/117

Thanks for the link. I definitely accept your point that temperature / climate has to be a strong determinant of behaviours that can be interpreted as 'intelligence' but also of other things.

To me, the biggest effect is likely to be an urgency to do something. In a warm climate it's better to take it easy, and you don't have to worry about shelter etc. In the cold you are going to have to get the fuck up and do stuff, and who wants to sit around relaxing.

But three issues come to mind. (I put these to you as genuine questions, as you seem to have properly thought about it).

First, is this biological or sociological? You can imagine it being either (or both), and you'd think this could be answered scientifically:

what are the biological correlates of warm or cold climates?

Second, just because you are in a warm climate and don't have the urgency of needing shelter etc, you will still be living at the edge of natural selection - because all living things do (or did until we started controlling our environment as we do now). Intelligence still had to be a major part of how people competed and survived in hot climates. So it's not obvious to me that urgency because of cold is more likely to foster evolution of intelligence than urgency because of, say, need to avoid predators or gather food efficiently. Perhaps its a different kind of intelligence?

Third there are plenty of very hot places with non-black races - what's your view of those people?

doesn't sound like you understood the mechanism by which heat caps intelligence.

tell you what. if you join my site i may answer some of your stupid questions because i like to create the illusion that i actually have users on there. but there is no point for me to tell you anything here as you don't understand anything i say anyway.

i should add that aside form low intelligence another important characteristic of blacks is high testosterone.

both black men and women have higher testosterone than any other race.

high testosterone is what makes blacks aggressive.

and it is the combination of stupidity and aggressiveness that makes them incompatible with any kind of western civilization.

by contrast Japs are the opposite - they have high IQ and low Test. it is likely that low Testosterone is a direct result of high intelligence when it comes to evolution. that is to say high Test is beneficial for hunters but detrimental in any other type of society.

essentially blacks are unfit for sharing a habitat with anything but Hyenas and other African Wild Life.

i will have to write a separate article about negative correlation between intelligence and testosterone on a race level.

there is no such correlation on individual level.

but yes it is true Niggers have Huge Dicks, Balls and High Testosterone.

Chimpanzee testicles are almost the same size as their brain, and Niggers are half-chimps. When you understand those two facts about Niggers you really understand EVERYTHING there is to know about Niggers.

here is a pic of Chimpanzee Testicle size compared to Chimpanzee Brain size

Mm, I was interested in what you said because it seemed that you were thinking objectively about these questions.

But the fact you refer to black people as niggers, and the way you talk about black people makes it seem like its more of an emotional or personal view - is that fair?

they're objectively niggers and if you don't take personal experience of having had to deal with them into consideration and instead chalk it up to "bad apples" you're not going to make it.

granted not all black people are Niggers just like not all women are Hoes and not all Jews are Kikes, but an engineer has to design for the worst case scenario not hope for the best.

having a seatbelt isn't the same as wanting to crash. having a gun isn't the same as wanting to kill people. they are precautionary measures that any intelligent person would use.

likewise no sane man would ever get close to Niggers if he had any way of avoiding it.

the way we avoid niggers is by living in LOW DENSITY SUBURUBS, driving a car, not using public transportation, and staying away from apartment buildings.

also i'm muting you. good bye.