Claude:

Hobbes' "Leviathan" presents the thesis that human beings must surrender their natural freedoms to an absolute sovereign power in order to escape the "state of nature" - a condition of perpetual war, fear, and chaos.

In this state of nature, Hobbes famously describes human life as "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." He argues that humans are naturally self-interested and competitive, leading to constant conflict when left ungoverned.

The central argument is that individuals should enter into a "social contract," transferring their rights to a powerful sovereign (the Leviathan) who maintains peace and order through the monopoly of force. This sovereign power is necessary because without it, society would collapse into anarchy and violence.

Hobbes justifies this seemingly harsh position by claiming that even an authoritarian government is preferable to the chaos of the state of nature. The sovereign's absolute authority is legitimized by the consent of the governed, who voluntarily surrender certain freedoms for the security and stability that only a powerful central authority can provide.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I suspect your "omnicide cult" IS the Leviathan, but I'd have to do some research to know whether they really are the same

Sounds sensible now that I got the explanation 🤙

Thank you for the summary

We will probably need a powerful central authority to kill all the omnicidal denialists that outnumber survivalists

But we also seem to need decentralized communication infrastructure to keep natural selection going so we can evolve into a good species instead of getting locked into selective breeding and atrophying while we're still shitty to begin with