Yeah the Russians knew it was BS but in a Cold War, they lost a propaganda battle.
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/ex-russian-space-boss-finds-no-proof-americans-landed-moon-1969
Discussion
More likely than not
There is tons and tons of evidence in the public domain, what is this guy smoking 🤣
Like the film? Oops, lost that..
The technology? Apparently can’t be reproduced 54 years later despite the fact computers have improved 10,000X since then.
Or do you mean the ‘moon rocks’? 😂
Which film? There's tons of still and moving imagery that's all publicly available for scrutiny and that I haven't seen any real criticism of. Did they have After Effects in 1969?
How do you explain all of the footage? How do you explain the laser ranging data still being produced to this day using the reflectors left on the moon by the Apollo missions?
It hasn't been reproduced because the space race was won and the cold war ended. It's incredibly expensive to go to the moon, I think the US used something like 1% of its federal budget on it. Even back in the 60s, during the height of the cold war and "red moon" panic, there was a lot of pushback from taxpayers. There have been various proposals to go back in the past few decades but there just hasn't been the budget. As I'm sure you're aware the Artemis program is now in full swing and we'll likely see another moon landing before the end of this decade.
Computing power isn't the limiting factor. And especially not the on-board computing power; the calculation-intensive orbital mechanics was all done from the ground using the many rooms full of computing power at nasa, not the AGC on board. All of the source code is public and there are simulators/emulators out there so there's no excuse for not understanding how it was done and how everything was programmed.
Computers are not the problem here. Orbital mechanics are same as they were in 60s and 70s. You just need basic math to calculate how to get to the moon.
Costs are the real blocker. Back then costs did not matter. Moon race Was another level of cold war. Right now everything is way more expensive and NASA fight battles each year to get budget from the US which they rather want to spend on space exploration which can be done unmanned and can lead into new findings and push science forward.
There is nothing interesting left to be found on the moon so it's not a priority.
Space probe is pennies in comparison to send people anywhere outside of atmosphere.
Simple as that.
Artemis mission is more about learning how to live outside of Earth and establish another space station on higher orbit than just visit the moon once more.
This is my favourite topic just because it riles everyone up so much 😂
The moon landing might be what instigates WWIII.
I talked a few years ago with a Hungarian well known phisicist (I'm not allowed to tell anyone his name because ge is afraid of the possible"fallout") who worked back then with the Russians in the space race. When he was in Russia he talked with the best Russian scientists and they all said that this was not possible on multiple levels. I only remember on few things:
1. The rocket cannot fly with the required amount of fuel to make such a trip.
2. The space radiation (when you leave the Earth magnetic protection) would kill the astronauts in not years, but possible months.
I don't remember well, but maybe they said that to protect the crew from radiation you would need a few meters of lead shield which weight would be enormous.
There were few others, but I don't remember well, so I would not write it down.
The official story is full of unexplainable holes likes this. The preponderance of evidence says it’s bullshit but to attack such an ‘important moment’ is blasphemy to many, they prefer to live in the illusion rather than confront the reality.
Well I talked a few months ago with a mexican fisisist (whose name I cannot name because they threatened to throw hom in a canal full of alligators). He insisted that the US actually went to Mars instead of the Moon, but they didn't want to let anybody in on how advanced the space program was.
So there.
Dude, it's not like cosmic radiation levels are something magical and unknkwn. Your story is so full of bullshit that can be overthrown by average high school student with minimal knowledge about physics and radiation. xD
I'm waiting the calculation. 🤙
Alrighty.
LND installed on Lunar Lander Chang'E 4 hanging o. The moon right now measured average radiation dose on lunar surface as 1369 uSv/day which gives us around 500 mSv/yr or 0,5 Sv/yr
Source for above:
https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.aaz1334
Which in fact is the same as:
'(2) The annual limits to the lens of the eye, to the skin of the whole body, and to the skin of the extremities, which are:
(ii) A shallow-dose equivalent of 50 rem (0.5 Sv) to the skin of the whole body or to the skin of any extremity.'
Defined by US Nuclear Regulatory Comission.
Source:
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part020/part020-1201.html
There are also researches about dose that Apollo missions participants received during whole 12 days of the mission but you do not believe in their existence so there's no point bringing them here.
You guys have ban on Google or just too lazy to verify simple facts?
Ohh so that your just repeating the same old narratives. Well then Goggle is really your friend. 🤦♂️I will tell the phisicist guy to throw out his PhD because Google says other results what he and others calculated really hard with multiple formulas while "Science.org" says let's just use one "measured" parameter... You're right in one thing: We won't be ever on the same side in this.
Provide me those made up PhD fella calculations if you are so sure of them. 🙃
You know that I don't have them because I wasn't there when they made it. (Not even born)
But the way with you tried to prove that I'm wrong was just repeating the same old mainstream narrative I also heard and no real (crazy long and difficult calculation) which can be made WITHOUT measuring just with knowing some hard theoretical phisics. How funny is that it yours and theirs results are totally different and let's add to it that in decades no one repeated the Moon travel... probably because it is not worthy it not because it is crazy hard even with today's technics. But yeah, let's aim to a bigger goal to the Mars without ever repeating the Moon landing... 😂 I'm out, feel free to believe the official narrative.
One of my main interest is space observation and space exploration (historical and modern) so you tackled my field of expertise since many years. Why we don't repeated moon landing in 50 years I've explained up there. Going and landing to the moon is easy. Many countries doing this right now with probes. Putting there humans is expensive and scientifically unnecessary. I've elaborated on it more in other comment here.
Shitload of probes from various countries photographed leftovers from Apollo landing sites through out the years but yea. It's one big conspiracy and nwo just to trick everybody and gain nothing in return. 🙃
Really? Who taught you all Those “Facts”? 😆 NASA even acknowledged they can’t get through the Van Allen Radiation belt, how did they get to the moon?
Because Russian officials have a perfect track record when it comes to speaking the truth 😂
Zaps for talking about it