Gm, the quorum of the key holders to your Bitcoin does not make something non-custodial. The only thing that matters is whether your explicit cooperation is necessary to move your Bitcoin.

As the saying goes: Not your keys, not your coins.

It's not: "Not your 3-of-5 multisig but your coins – oh maybe 5-of-7 but you can't really verify whether these 7 people are actually the same entity or not so it might be just a 1-of-1 because it's not your keys remember, but maybe they are an aggregated Schnorr signature which might use Musig2 (it's unclear to you) or maybe it's a Frost threshold signature you can't really say because they all look the same – but hey it's a multisig right and multisigs turn into non-custodial systems when they reach a magic threshold of 3 to 7 or maybe 50 it's kinda undefined."

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

gm 🙏

This sounds complicated.

GM nostr:npub12rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sf485vg

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=700x525&blurhash=%23YJQZitl9Ft6WBadV%3Fs%3AoL%7EBxuIpWBWVWBjFWCe.DikCx%5Dt7bvaebIWBaeIAo0x%5Dt7oLayWBV%40WCi_j%5BX8aeoft7f6WBj%5DofV%5BR*j%5BWBoft7ofj%5BRjV%40t7WBRjj%5BbHkCoL&x=6d6bedda9e2e82162ef2ece946e94a1c469492d9865c8c721edd2aa517473a47

Gm, thanks 🙏

Thank you for pointing this out.

Each Multi-sig is not created equally.

Ensure you understand the quorum dynamics, otherwise it might not be “your” Bitcoin

If you don't have a required key to that multisig, or if there isn't a covenant that will pay you out, or if there isn't another mechanism, that guarantees atomicity, it's not your Bitcoin 🤙

All of this sounds so so complicated but from what I gather, there’s a trade off of ownership to have a better user experience?

Yes, that's custody.

GM calle

Scales transactional throughput and privacy.

Doesn't scale UTXO ownership.

Morning☕😊