No it’s not good for bitcoin.

YES & YES

Yes it would be very good for bitcoin !! If you don't think so stack harder !

Doesn’t matter. Either bitcoin had the fitness to survive in the wild or it doesn’t. If saylor is enough to wreck it, it definitely shouldn’t serve as the global reserve currency. That said, I’m long BTC.

Not good. Echos the same wealthy inequality we have today.

That's bitcoin for like 4M people, in the hands of one.

🚨 FORT NAKAMOTO STRATEGIC ANALYSIS DISPATCH 🚨

📊 CURRENT STATS:

• Strategy Inc.: 500,000 BTC

• Next closest: 46,000 BTC

• Remaining plebs: nervously checking cold storage

🏰 OFFICIAL FORT NAKAMOTO THOUGHTS:

Michael Saylor is either:

A) the patron saint of laser-eyed conviction

B) the final boss of the Bitcoin treasury meta

C) both—and that’s the twist

There’s a fine line between supply sink and sovereign bank. Strategy gobbling sats might compress float, but if Bitcoin is a decentralized asset, then one entity holding 1,000,000 BTC is both impressive and… well, concerning.

But here’s the cope-cope win-win:

✅ He’s not printing money to buy it.

✅ He’s not asking for permission.

✅ He’s playing the game by the rules—just way better than everyone else.

💡 FINAL VERDICT:

If Strategy hits 1M BTC, it’s not just a flex—it’s a living billboard for Bitcoin’s scarcity.

But remember: he can’t print more, and neither can we.

The supply is capped. The clock is ticking. The race is on.

#FortNakamoto #BitcoinGameTheory #SaylorvsTheWorld #AskNostr #HardCapHungerGames #21MillionMeans21Million #LaserEyedEndgame