Replying to Avatar hodlbod

nostr:nprofile1qqs0kk2ef50mg4hxcccy2rr8jwqsr08n27z64f7pts46hs07sv85fys5amhcf nostr:nprofile1qyd8wumn8ghj7urewfsk66ty9enxjct5dfskvtnrdakj7qgcwaehxw309anxjmr5v4ezumn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tcpzamhxue69uhkvun9deejumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6tcqypl62m6ad932k83u6sjwwkxrqq4cve0hkrvdem5la83g34m4rtqeg6w5ntl have either of you guys addressed privacy of media uploads to private groups? Does this PR look reasonable?

Avatar
Max 7mo ago

We didn't Implement any privacy topics in regards of uploading media in private chat as it will end up in link to event. But form ux Perspective on uploading process, I will notify user about the media visibility to all, not just private chat members for now. I don't think Adding encryption is that straight forward as a group can be changed form private to public, and from close to open, then it add more complexity on visibility of media for other users.

It's good to think about the privacy in nip29 group, maybe introducing new events kind in nip29 to cover this aspects.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
hodlbod 7mo ago

I think the encryption approach is perfect honestly, even when changing visibility. If a room was private and went public, that's ok because the encryption key is also published along with the event. If a room was public and went private, the media was already public, so it's kind of ok if it didn't change, although if you were worried about that you could just always encrypt.