For those who didn’t know about this bill, here's a simple breakdown:

The U.S. stablecoin bill – called the GENIUS Act – is a new proposal to create clear rules for stablecoins. Stablecoins are a type of digital money that’s usually tied to something stable, like the U.S. dollar. The idea is to make sure these coins are safe and trustworthy.

The bill says that companies that issue stablecoins must keep enough cash or very safe assets to back up every stablecoin they put into circulation. That way, if someone wants to trade their stablecoin for real money, the company should always be able to do that.

It also says that if one of these companies goes out of business, the people who own stablecoins get paid back first – before company executives or lawmakers who might be involved. This is meant to stop powerful people from playing favorites.

Some people like the bill because it could make stablecoins more common and trusted, maybe even growing the market a lot. But others, like Senator Elizabeth Warren, think it doesn’t do enough to protect people or stop shady deals – especially with people like President Trump being involved in crypto projects.

And that’s about it. What’s your take? Do you support the bill?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I have been pouring over the constitution, I have yet to find somewhere that allocates authority to the federal government to regulate stablecoins, or even gold.

The Constitution doesn’t directly let the feds regulate stablecoins or gold, but they use old, broad powers to do it anyway — and courts have usually let them get away with it.

This isn't old powers, they are voting now....

I say these are old powers because they use mainly:

1. The Commerce Clause – which lets them regulate stuff that affects trade between states or countries.

2. The Coinage Clause – which lets them control money.

3. The Necessary and Proper Clause – which lets them make laws that help carry out the other powers.

These clauses are old clauses, they used them in 1933 when they wanted to ban people from owning gold…

Me saying they are old does not mean they don't work today, it means they have been here for a very long time.

The interstate commerce clause does not allow for the regulation of private business, as if it did, it would contradict the requirement for government to not interfere with private contract. The courts have routinely blown this one in the past hundred years. It is about disputes between the states.

The coinage clause is about using money for government debts and payments, not for regulating private usage.

But I suppose they also don't have the power to regulate arms and impose background checks, yet here we are.....