Over the past few years, I’ve seen #Bitcoin fans and people who view themselves as influencers take a variety of uncompromising stances on things that have nothing to do with hard money.

Whether it was dietary (meat-only), constitutional (2A), political (insert preferred lunatic), cultural (modern art sucks), medical (anti-vaxx), environmental (anti-ESG), etc. and now, it seems, there’s this trend to promote human reproduction. I typically don’t like to get involved in any of these arguments because, well, it’s a waste of my precious time.

When I first became interested in it, ten years ago, I was fascinated by an immutable, censorship-resistant, cryptographically secure, pseudonymous, global, P2P, non-governmental, digital money that was, at that time, non-correlated to other asset classes. I saw this value then and I still do, for the most part. But that’s it.

Just because I was early in appreciating this, I don’t think that gives me special knowledge in other domains. Evidently, others feel differently.

On the topic of raising a family, do it if you want.. but implying that other people’s lives are meaningless if they do not want kids is just something I cannot abide.

I’m here to tell you that child-free is great, too. Don’t let society, parents, or bullies pressure you into doing something you don’t want to do. You only get one life, do what you want with it. nostr:note1f6zhtr80pp6rskpngcgtcaqv3m4qd5vtsskn2e39g5z9k3k7l54ssax9k0

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You do list a bunch of unrelated things, but you have to admit that having kids is related to hard money.

I don’t follow. What connection do you see between the two?

Generational wealth. A wise and successful person leaves wealth to their grandchildren.

No. A wise an successful person leaves wealth to *anyone* they deem should be a beneficiary. There is no requirement that it be a blood relation. It can be a friend or a friend’s child. It can be a donation to anonymous individuals. It can be an endowment to a charity dedicated to a cause, or university for scholarships.

You're looking at it backward. People with children want hard money to leave their descendants. It's linked.

No, you’re looking at it myopically.

Unless, do you think ONLY people with children/descendants want to support others??

Though I am child-free, I feel support people (as well as non-human animals) who will outlive me, most of whom I do not know, will not know, and who will never know me. That’s what philanthropy is all about. Hard money serves this purpose for me just as much as it does for someone who only wants to give to their blood relatives.

Every single nepo baby and trust fund kid I know that was afforded the vaunted “generational wealth” ended up a hot mess in life.

Never has such a group of “free thinkers” been so opinionated about others should live their lives.