bad advice

ecash is custodial.

first principles or GTFO.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Chainalysis thanks you

There is also the option to: https://coinjoin.nl 🕶️

like hell they do.

heres the latest from CA about "monero tracing"

tldr unless they have access the sending wallet they dont know shit

meanwhile youre going to exchange your sats for a shitcoin from a custodian, hide in an unknown anonset you cant verify and hope they dont rug you before you cash back out.

much cypherpunk 🙄

https://v.nostr.build/D4Nzp22vRF35IRnz.mp4

I'm pretty sure Chainalysis is more thankful for you using ecash since it's visible to the mint itself. Even Cashu's own website admits it!

https://docs.cashu.space/faq

if he could read he would be so mad right now

I love how he went radio silent after my reply haha.

these types of people reliably never even care if what they are saying is true or not. they just get mad if you buy something other than bitcoin, because they bought bitcoin and if you don't do it after they do you are taking food out of their mouth. give it a couple weeks and this clown will go right back to claiming that cashu replaces monero. he will completely forget accidentally looking at the documentation you sent him. he doesn't care.

🫂

its really not a good look to be publicly wrong and then dip when it's pointed out

👍

If i'm wrong then don't use cashu and continue with XMR.

If it wasn't clear from my lack of response, I don't care to debate the topic further.

If you're specifically targeted, there's little to be done for online privacy. You'll leak metadata eventually.

The BDHKE in cashu is based on the discrete log problem, a fundamental primitive for modern cryptography. How is BDHKE less private than the ring signatures XMR uses?

I missed the part where anybody said it was less secure cryptographically.

The security assumptions of BDHKE via discrete log give Cashu it's privacy.

yeah nobody's disputing its privacy homie

🤫