Lol okay.
—If you cant attack the argument, you attack the person. Noted.
🍻
Discussion
Are we doing cheers 🥂
No point in arguing with someone whose position is the presumption of guilt, so yes, GFY is appropriate.
I just wanted to search of this hairdressers name and see if there were any photos of his hand.
Like “Maryland Man”
You know why they didn’t use his name in the news?
Because once his name got out, people were able to research him.
Turns out he had gang tattoos on his fingers and he in the country illegally because he wouldn’t be eligible otherwise.
—So I just asked his name and you resorted to acting like a frustrated child.
Here’s the “Maryland Man”
He’s a fucking gang member & human trafficker.
The body cam footage of his arrest is available if you search up his name:
Kilmar Abrego Garcia
In any event, I’m just stating facts.
Oh and he was deported and brought back because they couldn’t “prove” his guilt. (Sounds like due process to me)
He also wasn’t tortured or imprisoned during his stay in El Salvador either.
So pretty much everything you’ve said is nonsense. You just choose to believe the news you “like”
Wrong guy. You obviously have no clue who I’m referring to.
I was using an example of a different guy on purpose. “Maryland man”
The guy you referred to as “a hairdresser” and I just asked you his name… What’s his name so I can educate myself?
You were offering to wager 5000 sats on an innocent man’s life. I find that disgusting.
Not interested in continuing this conversation. ✌️
No he wasn't.
He was betting you the guy wasn't just a " headresser" and you were full of it.
Kinda looks like you are full of it if that's all you got.
I’m “full of it” beacuse I won’t play your sick game where you assume people are guilty before they even have evidence presented in court. I don’t need to talk to you, either. ✌
Yep.
He’s a libtard 🥴
🥾👅💦