Discussion
Never been a fan of Osho. His speech patterns (especially the way he ends his sentences with a sort of hiss) seems more about inducing a trance state than guiding individuals to a place where they can find it themselves.
Krishnamurti on the other hand, that guy was punk. Got wrangled in to becoming the next "messiah" for an organisation controlled by a bunch of opportunistic aristocrats. He stayed true to himself and the beliefs being spouted, accepted the reigns and used that power to shut the organisation down. What a fucking hero.
"I maintain that truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by
any path whatsoever, by any religion, by any sect. That is my point of
view, and I adhere to that absolutely and unconditionally. Truth, being
limitless, unconditioned, unapproachable by any path whatsoever, cannot
be organized; nor should any organization be formed to lead or coerce
people along a particular path. ... This is no magnificent deed, because
I do not want followers, and I mean this. The moment you follow someone
you cease to follow Truth. I am not concerned whether you pay attention
to what I say or not. I want to do a certain thing in the world and I
am going to do it with unwavering concentration. I am concerning myself
with only one essential thing: to set man free. I desire to free him
from all cages, from all fears, and not to found religions, new sects,
nor to establish new theories and new philosophies."
Osho… some useful tools and tips but feels like he used word poetry to justify his sexual appetite and didn’t actually understand the depth of the value of the feminine
Osho was more of a mystic ,
he’s definitely not using word poetry to justify his sexual appetite
Osho was a man beyond depth .
I’ve read a bit and appreciate his depth and contributions. I get being as sovereign as humanely possible. But there’s something off in my gut watching old interviews. Too bad can’t interact irl. Would likely make clear quickly