Replying to Avatar Freakoverse

Ye! I saw nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z 's post utilizing different kinds for different file types and had a website ip and running on nostr. Everything is perfect and I'm super hyped about it. All that was left was to solve the ICANN problem =3

To your points:

1. First come first claim. Others can take the same name, but they can't take when the first person who took it is.

2. The NPUB in the Blockchain is the owner of the name and controls the rexords. Transfer of ownership is recorded in the chain.

A) I'm not an expert on this so I can't answer this properly, but I'd imagine a software specified in this would be developed to search for these specific transactions and categorize them for fast searching (if you're running a node with umbrel for example, you'd download that software and use it).

B) That's a... Well, that's an issue with Bitcoin and nostr all together then? x3

That's just a responsibility with the individual that they have to have, like in those 2 protocols, and take the appropriate security measures.

Avatar
Freakoverse 2y ago

Oh, is everyone getting tagged in each reply? Sorry too! x3

I guess this should prompt nostr clients to include 2 things later:

1. Mute Post Thread (from the perspective of the person getting tagged along in replies).

2. (Reply to: @ @ //@ @ //@ ) from the perspective of a person replying and wanting only reply to specific tagged individuals.

.

B + last paragraph)

Aren't most Bitcoin users (and I'm not even talking about Binance and similar custodial users) are trusting third parties with their transactions as they aren't running their own node? As long as things can be verified by the user themselves, like how it is with Bitcoin and everyone's kind of fine with it, then I don't think this is that big of an issue. What can also be done is provide the user with the power to change who's providing them the node data, like how it is with Blue Wallet for example, and even allowing adding multiple ones and cross checking the end result to decrease the chance of fowl play.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.