Subscriptions are ultimately unfair businesses models in many cases.

For some they are fine, but I suspect for the vast majority of people there’s no way everyone utilizes products in an evenly distributed fashion. It may be fair for 3 months but useless on the 4th.

I understand why they exist and it’s a nice way to support a business you like and utilize. But if we are talking strictly fairness, people get ripped off from time to time.

I’m not sure what the fix is, perhaps an option to pause or a way to easily opt back in once you’re automatically opted out? I suspect no developer will create this functionality for themselves. The other option is pay as you go.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Credit and pay as you go is fairer.

Although Lightning (and even better Cashu, with ability to send e-cash in requests / headers) allow trustless payg.

Subs much simpler though and works in most cases.

Prepay as you go in chunks.

E.g. Pay for a relay, or VPN, or storing a file whatever.. for the next 90 days. Then topup whenever you like, with an in-app reminder as you get close.

Service providers need to know their forward looking revenues for planning as well

There are a few challenges.

Products will always have a distribution curve for its users. Both on usage and value they perceive or extract. Power users are effectively discounted by regular/infrequent users.

Businesses have recurring costs and cashflow is king. Predictable cashflow is a huge advantage. Subscriptions help map costs back to % sales. Salaries are regular costs.. this is the largest bind.

It can take a while to extract value from a customer or recover sales/marketing expense for that user. A larger upfront fee is a higher barrier to entry and many sales won’t happen. It’s why the refund guaranteed stuff blew up, but died now with subscriptions.

Even when you pause a subscription there is often a business cost involved. Or worst case it’s a liability because you have more to manage that is effectively serviced at your expense.

Consumption based pricing works well for commodities where like for like competition exists and it’s a market driven price. Cheaper can mean same value, just at a better price/discount.

If different options exist, at some point the winning options will take the market.

Pay as you go utilising Lightning micro payments. Offer a separate subscription for discounts. I bet 50% of all gym customers would be better of paying per visit instead of per month

I’m excited to see how lightning payments fit into the bigger picture!