One common mistake I sometimes have to catch myself on is this idea that journalists are intelligent & using their intelligence & platform to advance nefarious narratives.

Many times journalists are nothing more than blundering dipshit morons who haven't a clue what they're writing about.

🤣🤣🤣

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Always assume that, no matter the job. The more the job can pay, the more likely it is. But, never forget the real ones.

Much like governments around the world, they're often way less intelligent than they're given credit for.

They all have one thing in common, full of people seeking power.

Do you want to rule?

Yes.

Ok, disqualified.

The best politicians are the ones who refuse to be politicians.

I don’t mind politics, we all engage in politics when communicating. My problem is with parasites.

What's the difference? 🤪

Politicians don’t really do politics? 🤣

💯🎯

Now imagine academia. 😅

Oh, totally. The collectivism in academia is totally disgusting.

Many times? Its difficult for them to describe a dog taking a shit without getting one of the facts wrong, like that it was a dog and not a kangaroo.

The NYT getting the town's name where Riot is located in the very first paragraph of their latest anti-Bitcoin article comes to mind.

What’s more dangerous: A bunch of cigar smoking dudes in a room planning world domination or one cigar guy puppet mastering a bunch of useful idiots?

But, but, I LIKE cigars!

Truth.

Journalists, at their very best, are failures at the industry they claim to report on. Generally they are barely literate imbeciles who got where they are by knowing someone.

Recognize your handle from my BT days, welcome & followed 🤙