Since I remember you saying fucked up shit to me in the past, I've gotta point out that your wording makes it sound like we're not discussing a hypothetical you presented, and I assume that's not an accident
But also, what are you even saying? How do you suggest you'd hedge your bet without holding both in this case?
I'm saying hypothetically it would be more efficient if there was just one that could do it all and you wouldn't need to hedge
Maybe, but that could also help power consolidate into a small group of people over time and then backfire
If a consolidated group of power seeked rent based on position then a new coin with better decentralition would outcompete the rent seeking
Then that's not just one
Eventually we solve the problems and have the coin
Seems unlikely, like people would always keep things changing instead
Theres not really an endless improvement to money. There are a number of attributes and i think they can be perfected in crypto.
