I believe that would be your problem for using a custodial service to send Bitcoin to a blacklisted address. It's not cash apps fault they have to comply with regulators.
That would be why I use it to round up Bitcoin and send it to my own wallets and for $ . You should never keep any significant amount of Bitcoin in a custodial service. Any Bitcoin you held there was not your Bitcoin in the first place.
I don't keep large amounts in custodial wallets. I bought a small amount on CashApp back when they were new. I made a transaction. Where I sent it to doesn't matter. They closed my account the next day and sent me a vague email about suspicious transaction activity. I will not use a service that operates this way and I will continue to warn everyone else about it.
this is actual authoritarian game plan - middleman companies n trying comply with law - we commoner r real pawns n our savings cannon fodder - where we wanna send/why we wanna send decided by them
Then don't send to anyone but yourself from a custodial service?
That should not matter. At all. You are not thinking like a Bitcoiner, you're thinking like a statist cuck.
It does matter completely. Has nothing to do with being a Bitcoiner. Take responsibility for your own lack of opsec. Not Cash apps fault. The fact that you even did it at all shows how serious you are about privacy. You apparently don't give a shit about privacy. How do you expect to fight the state when you don't even keep your own financial transaction private?
One of us understands opsec and it's role in fighting the state. You do not.
I didn't send it to a mixing address. I didn't send it to a darkweb marketplace. I sent it to a clearnet site that legitimately serves US customers. CashApp is in the wrong here, not me. They are fucking censorious garbage of a service and I would steer any new user away from them.
Bottlepay in the UK is similar. You can't even withdraw to your own lightning node without proving you own it.
I wouldn't call companies "in the wrong" for being cautious and complying with regulations. But I prefer to stay away from that stuff and support P2P whenever possible.
Yes, of course. This is what Muun, Zeus and Green are doing on my phone...
Swan is a fantastic Bitcoin only company, encouraging self custody and even automating my withdrawals.
Also, notice Braiins... Anything I mine is KYC Free of course.
> as time goes there 2 flavors of BTC chocolate then or more - dark , white just like we cash note n bank accounts - (some places i heard banks u surcharge in bulk cash withdraw bc it gets our surveillance )
> never kill messenger - "companies" implement what jurisdictions asked them to do or shuts their biz
Exactly. Would you rather cash app comply and be able to get Bitcoin to people that can use their service? Or not not comply and the whole on ramp is closed?
If you don't like cash app you might want to rethink using nostr since development has been largely funded by the same person.
Go back to twitter.
Since we're at the name calling phase, you're a poser that clearly doesn't understand anything about privacy, opsec or the cypherpunk movement that made all this possible, nor do you give a shit about anyone else rights. You only care for your own privilege to infringe on anyone else's rights so long as it suits your personal needs.
You need to remove libertas from your fake ass name because you don't understand the meaning of the word.
Where you send from someone else service absolutely matters...
You should only send funds from custodial services to yourself. My guess is you sent it to a known bad actor. You know it. That's your own fault. Not theirs. You want to send value to whoever you want? Fine, but don't expect someone else to do it for you and deny all responsibility when the other party isn't okay with it.
How would you feel if I used you to send value on my behalf to someone that you fundamentally disagree with on values? You would deny me the ability to send it. That's natural incentive and you don't even need a state or policy to enforce that.
You're just complaining to complain because you refuse to take responsibility for your own lack of opsec.
