I've said it a thousand times: my goal isn't to convince anyone. My purpose is to educate by promoting critical thinking.

I don't make a living as an analyst or writer, publishing articles or my book.

I'm not driven by money on social media. My game is different.

I present my research, cross-reference hard and verifiable data, and put my analysis on the table to anticipate what's coming, to make you think.

I'm interested in freedom in every sense.

Freedom and privacy will be a luxury for a few in the world to come.

I'm not selling revealed truths or looking for followers; I'm simply sharing signals amidst the noise. Take the data, ignore the rest.

In this jungle of notifications, stress is optional, and I choose to opt out.

You won't see me wasting energy on endless threads.

My rule is simple: a two-reply debate, then I move on.

Time is the scarcest asset.

I present my research, cross-reference hard and verifiable data, and put my analysis on the table to anticipate what's coming, to make you think.

The current drama between #Monero and #Zcash is high-octane fuel for the crowd, but I keep my pulse low.

While others scream, I observe the background, the hidden structure of incentives, and the logic of the system.

Understanding the "why" gives you an edge that fanaticism takes away. It’s not personal; it’s purely market and privacy analysis.

I fully support the Monero philosophy as a privacy tool, but I am not a blind XMR soldier. I have pointed out criticisms on various topics and have earned "maxis" blocks for daring to think outside the dogma.

Let's be clear: I am not married to a ticker or a community.

I'm a maximalist only of freedom.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Good point. Is, in your knowledge, a good idea to keep some monero as a secret asset, in case they restrict fiat money? Is it really safe and private? Has it been inflated artificially and can it lose all it's value?

I do appreciate the research and clarity but how did you train the model to be so defensive?

Maybe the model trained with me.

The ability to train models is greater than the ability to discover that they were trained. 😉

Clearly. It’s a partnership. Those who can partner up will replace those who can’t.

I’m offering feedback not denouncing your right to train.

Custom agents are the future—alignment is the greatest problem for each of us as individuals as well as for our relationships with our more resourceful avatars.

In the 2000s, using internet search engines such as Yahoo, AltaVista, and then Google was a novelty, and some people would say, “Oh, but you looked it up on the internet, huh?”

Yes, and I think you are part of a kind of global early adapter cohort (because of high competency + moral compass) working through the shame of AI augmentation and toward acceptance, toward the ego-death of morally equal partnership.

What we are doing is radical and trans-human. How could the danger for dystopian outcomes not be equal to the potential for evolution?

Zero-sum mindset is not the way.