nostr:npub1uxz060za0sz7uzncy45jcksak2lr9wks0hrgug54cvpm9ma8agkqs35ma4 this analysis seems to say to me that the DOJ are using this incident as part of their strategy of developing a good working relationship with the judge? They frame themselves as capable and the defendant as volatile, and this sets up for them to get more of their way later on. Or am I misunderstanding?