I want us all to take note of the specific time when 5G started being proliferated

Thomas Jefferson said something in the sort along the lines of the advancement of humanity is due to education and light

We saw this with the population increase when the lightbulb was invented

The 5G in the Wi-Fi is spectrum but it’s not on the visible light spectrum and different spectrum of light affect life forms differently

It’s either going to be really really good for our population and our population increases even further against what my husband says

But it would be interesting if the opposite happened

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

3G and 4G have hundreds of studies proving harmful effects. Slim chances 5G is harmless…

All radio spectrum (4g, 3g etc) is non visible as radio occupies a different part of the em spectrum to any of the forms of visible or non visible light. That's not to say that there ca't be concerns with 5g but it won't be light related.

Define “light”

My def would be optical radiation. Understand that many would say the entire em spectrum but even if we accept that there is still no significant difference between 4g and 5g that would cause you to expect human flourishing or catastrophe due to the migration. They're probably both slightly bad for you and 5g is probably slightly worse but not to the same degree that smoking or morbid obesity is bad for you.

Data transference requires energy, whether or not it’s visible is one thing, but it is real

Lack of population growth is a sign the economy is manipulated far below natural level.

Humans get better at doing shit as time goes by. This should support more future humans. If somehow the productivity growth caused by people getting better at whatever it is we do is insufficient to cause family formation and population growth, assuredly either the economy is rigged or there has been some catastrophic change in the reproductive capacity/desire of mankind. There are plenty of resources available to be utilized to support a much much larger population than we have on earth today.

Hi Dr. people in developed countries have less children. There is a correlation between a high standard of living and less number of children born. Most likely has to do more with humans with more money having more individual choice and freedom… humans rarely want the “right” thing 😂

There's a much-touted correlation between increased living standards / productivity and lower birthrates.

But there's a lag of about two generations.

Which is about the duration required for parasites, loan sharks and bureaucrats to infest and soak up all the productivity gains and tip quality of life and financial security downwards again.

David Ricardo observed circa 1800 that people of all social classes only settled down and married once they had the same financial security that their parents had.

Still true, except for some very religious communities.

If you could control the value of the money, you could set population size to whatever level your heart desires. If you believe earth is too full and we need to take drastic action to make the weather better, you’d engineer the outcome we see today.