What’s your take on this? I didn’t know he’s deleting his posts.
Discussion
He has to.
He is just doing what he can get away with doing.
still a fed bro
Any proof or just a baseless comment?
Have you read the book "softwar"?
If not you should
I have. I have gifted it to many. It is a warning not a comfort. he is a federal employee.
Listen to General Kwast 2 minutes
Is he a FED too?
General bro. so yes.
All military has a oath to the constituion not the FED.
in principle yes. tell them that when they have been given orders.
"If you have permissionless control over underlying property that sounds like you are now sovereign."
- Jason Lowery
Not something a FED would say.
Back up your words
https://video.nostr.build/2971769481c104fd03dd92b22297237c86bbb8e9b51c9249548f238fad1eb88d.mp4
how does this make him not a federal employee?
The military will be held to the oath.
More good people then bad.
held to the oath by whom? That is not the story that history paints. but maybe you are just less jaded than I am.
History has never had a military take a oath to a constitution.
This has been am experiment.
Time will tell if it fails or not.
#bitcoin has given us an out.
And many in the USA military knows it
and they will do their best to plug the hole. get a second passport.
they have an oath to the corporate "constitution" nestled neatly inside the federal "union" created by the OG Constitution... they are "officers" of DC internationalist "city" and are LEGALLY not American Nationals but "persons" of the 13th amendment.
Black piller
its not though, because ignorance is the blackest, most disempowering pill of all...
you can reclaim your status when you know what the scheme is...
doesnt mean the corrupt system will acknowledge it, but you are creating a matter of record in so doing and thus have some chance for recognition of your common law "law of land" status and therefore not subject to statutory takeover...
along with all of this learn criminal law and sue these motherfuckers - all they do these days is violate - its ripe for the taking.
Dicernment
Critical thinking tips:
- Be skeptical of all news, especially the news you like or already believe
- What is the source of the information?
- What is the source's source?
- How credible is that source?
- What biases might the source have?
- What is the context?
- How much information is being conveyed here? What facts?
- How much emotional language is being used?
- What is the framing of this information?
- What is the source directing the reader or viewer to conclude?
- Cross reference it. Are any other credible sources reporting the same or similar?
- Be willing to question your own beliefs and compare what you KNOW to what you BELIEVE.
- Consider opposing views, contradictory evidence, and alternative explanations.
- Assign a weight or measure of credibility to the information based on all of this. Be willing to disregard news you like or want to be true as well as willing to believe news you do not like or do not want to be true.
and bro . . . lower the hostility. its just internet. am not your enemy