Bitcoiners talking about conflict of interest again? I see another shism on the horizon.
Also Blockstream was a big battle field of interest that got ignored by many.
He attacks Bitcoin
This motivates a major change to Bitcoin
In the resulting discussion on github, he approves of this change (that is motivated by his attack)
If you point out this conflict of interest - no matter how politely - you will be banned.
nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx hope you're paying attention to all this

Bitcoiners talking about conflict of interest again? I see another shism on the horizon.
Also Blockstream was a big battle field of interest that got ignored by many.
it's magically okay to be a bitcoin developer and a lightning stan and push for a consensus change that enables the lying notwork. but when you maybe kinda sorta look like you might be doing that for ZK rollups, everyone gets to have an autistic meltdown about it.