I don't consume as much of their content as I should(?) but a quick "Bitcoin" search on their website gets hits for about 40 content items per year over the last 5 years. They've sprinkled in some based bitcoiners like Saifedean, Peter St. Onge and Stephan Livera. For sure they're trying to stick with the old white dude academic type reputation, maybe I'm just reading too selectively e.g. the Svanholm and de Wolf review of "Bitcoin, the inverse of 🤡 🌎" by Joakim Book. Hopefully the old guard will eventually give way to a world backed by digital scarcity

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.