Scarcity in block space is desirable also. Competition for block space keeps fees up, which will replace the subsidy over time, keeping the mining incentive healthy.

Scarcity in storage space (i.e. my ability to keep a copy of the block chain on inexpensive hardware) is already here ... some people struggle to set up a node for financial reasons. The fewer people can financially run a node, the more centralized the network becomes.

Cheap transactions should rise to Level 2, 3, and eventually 4 as each level becomes overburdened. This evolution is natural, expected, and desired. ... Assuming you want bitcoin/Bitcoin to expand to serve as the global currency.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Miners can have the same fee profits with more volume. Miners market will always regulate itself we don't need to actively fund them. You can increase the blocksize slower than hardware evolution, buying a node is a one time purchase and gets cheaper in time, you can even buy cheap second hand hardware. And if you can't use onchain, and no new users can be onboarded then less ppl will run nodes. Ppl must be able to use bitcoin to then think about running a node. I don't know what kind of math ppl are doing where paying 100usd for one bitcoin tx is better than 100/200 usd for a new hard-drive every 4 years. Pushing all tx to upper layers defeats the purpose of bitcoin, bc if fees get to 500/1k usd who will use bitcoin? We will all have to use strike or cash app which is no different than using PayPal.