You believe your car will turn on not because of faith, but because of evidence based results. Faith is, by definition, belief that doesn’t require proof. 🫶
Discussion
If you’ve ever drove a dodge you’d know “past results do not guarantee future results” I had a black dodge named Swan.
lol
We understand the world not by evidence but by the quality of our explanations of which evidence is a part.
I put ‘belief’ in the same category. It really hit home for me when I had a vax mandate deadline meeting with my lab’s big bosses, and the first thing I heard was the medical director saying “🙏please tell me you still BELIEVE in SCIENCE “.
That inversion blew my mind (and my career).
According to what definition of faith? If you look at how the word faith is used in a Biblical sense (like analyzing the word based on context) there’s no implication faith is not evidence based results.
I would argue faith is ~synonymous with trust. Trust can be stupid, based on a house of cards or backed by solid reasoning.
In Christianity, faith is encouraged to be tested. (For instance, Paul in 1 Corinthians 15 says that Christians should be pitied if Christ didn’t raise from the dead. He was arguing for his readers to test the claim, not just do what sounded cool at the time.)