I did.

They made an open source version of the same device that provides more control to users. If you are so pissed about this, then please stop buying phones because every phone is just a copy of an older design but with improvements.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That’s fine if Djuri wrote the code, mimic’d the Blockclock, and was making his code open source. It would be helpful if the end result didn’t look exactly like the original, I’d like to see something BETTER designed than the Blockclock. I’m not pissed about anything. I’m literally trying to decipher what the difference is between two projects that look very very identical. I already told you what I think about CK claiming source viewable vs FOSS. You interact like someone who has never had to ask a question before, humble yourself a little semisol

Yes, the code is fully independent from anything Coinkite has made.

Gotcha. Thanks for the info and that makes your OP about the situation make sense, thus much more alarming. Taking note on how this plays out and hope Djuri gets his project back up. Cheers

My wording was a bit harsh too and I understand. But overall, this is a pretty disappointing move from Coinkite.

The full, unaltered text of the takedown notice is here:

nostr:nevent1qqspdafxqmzasft60ft6zfxs3nsm6vf3ka0pae43dg66sq2evjay8ygpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumrpdejqzxrhwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7umhdpjhyefwvdhk6qg4waehxw309a5xjum59ehx7um5wghxcctwvsk8nct3

Great synopsis of the situation. Appreciate your insights to challenge my own. 🤝