Excellent. Concise.

The very system is designed for the exploitation of workers.

The most effective system of exploitation is the one that convinces its victims that it does not exist, and that they should aggressively defend its existence to their own detriment.

how is it a good point? it’s just communist nonsense.

here:

A takes 20 min when you do it (Good)

A takes 60 min when I do it. (Bad)

B takes 60 min when you do it. (Bad)

B takes 20 min when I do it. (Good)

So we are good and bad at different things.

You and I work separately.

You do your A (Good) & your B (Bad)

I do my A (Bad) & my B (Good).

We get 2A & 2B done in 80 min.

You and I work together.

You do your A (Good) & my A (Good)

I do my B (Good) & your B (Bad)

We get 2A & 2B done in 40 min.

You and I live in a Marxist regime.

You are assigned to B (Bad)

I am assigned to A (Bad)

We get 2A & 2B done in 120 min and then report to central authority +120 min.

See? Working together creates a comparative advantage. We make more stuff together, so we produce more, and everyone can have more, at a better a price, so quality of life goes up.

The professor pretended that an employee brings is good at A & B. Not true. The employee is good at A (Labor) but not at B (Marketing, Accounting, Organising).

Everyone loses when the employee does everything himself (A + B). Likewise when the employer does A + B, everyone loses. No comparative advantage.

LOL communist trash.