To be morally consistent, then, Liberals and Libertarians must either rationalize the present-day distribution of legal ownership of wealth, or find a basis for property rights that is not dependent on current legal ownership.
Honest Libertarians
https://www.lavenderhat.org/2017/11/25/nozick-supports-reparations-libertarians-must-pick-a-side/
Uh, no.
I have acquired all I own by moral means. No one else is ever entitled to that which I do not give with full informed consent. If you try, I will meet that attempt with as much force as I am able to weild or justify wielding to eliminate that threat to my property. And yes, I value my property more than I value your life.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.. Read the article or go willfully blind. You don't have to agree, challenge your mind to enjoy another thought, whether you agree or not. Peace !
I'm not wilfully blind. Anyone who says that I don't/can't own what I do is obviously not someone I'm going to take very seriously since people way smarter than I have been debating this for centuries at this point.
Reading that article is rather painful. It's not at all well thought out or consistent with anything that I'm historically or contemporaneously aware of under the banner of "libertarianism." Geez.
