I agree. They are cool little devices. It's the misleading marketing of this particular brand that I am responding to.

It's not necessary to reframe statistics (like the ones I put into proper perspective in my reply), use leading language to suggest these devices will regularly hit blocks when enough people buy them, or try to convince people this is the "last stand against centralized hash power."

People will buy them, and buy them with the proper context and expectations. There is no need for embellishment. It's not a good look.