“My concern is the founders and project is all based in one country.”

-We use a number of technologies that were largely developed in one country (like Kaspa). Take the dollar, electricity, the automobile, or the internet for example. Do people really sit back and think about if they’ll use it because of where it came from? If you’re saying people won’t use it because of where the core developers have ties to, you’re applying that principle selectively.

“I am highly skeptical that the world adopt said coin given the ideological opposing views in terms of politics.”

-The US dropped multiple huge bombs on Japan less than 100 years ago and they are some of the US’s closest allies today. Politics change with the wind.

-I’m not sure why you included world adoption in your sentence, as if that’s the goal.

“Furthermore, my biggest concern is the creator was noted on his medium saying he built Kas to get rich.”

-Please post this here for the context.

-Rich means you control your time and energy. If you use fiat, that somebody else prints, do you control your time and energy? You don’t want to control your time and energy? You don’t want to be rich? It was fair launched. What’s your point?

“Finally, best tech does not meant best money, if that was true, we would have new money backed by new tech every 2 to 3 years.”

-That’s not true at all. How many fair-launched, POW coins are there? And how many of those fair-launched POW coins are 1,000x faster. And how many of those coins support smart contracts as a fair-launched POW? “New tech” doesn’t make something money. When you look at the crap created in the last 2-3 years, you’ll understand better.