https://primal.net/e/nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq7el0qph2p6x7325zw3zr7qfvhhvk600xz8jatga4zwv9jy396tgqythwumn8ghj7cnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3uamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3dwp6kytnhv4kxcmmjv3jhytnwv46z7qpqhx60jwrs5pfyjhw834esuw7s0d4xha96e5vutr3sh7kfx0n0fhxqhy7fut

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Oh come on Jimmy. Lots of transactions in general pay too high a fee. With such a small sample size that’s not evidence of anything.

And, again, my point above was about what happens when people *regularly* want to create non-standard transactions. As long as it’s incredibly rare, there’s not a lot of demand and only one or two pools might offer it (indeed, F2Pool and MARA today). The whole start of this drama was because a potentially-large transactor wanted to fill the UTXO set with garbage because they didn’t want to rely on OP_RETURNs. Obviously that changes the calculus here.

Potentially large transactor? Please tell me you’re not referring to Citrea?