Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2y ago

Deleted the group frens πŸ«‚ simplex wasn’t ready for a large group like ours, this was only the beginning and frens we’re having too many issues.. small groups don’t have those issues and p2p doesn’t either 🫑

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Shawn 2y ago

Yeh, that app has a long way to go.

Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2y ago

Fr fr hopefully they have more people work on it, by the looks of it the development isn’t as solid as I thought https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplex-chat#readme

Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2y ago

So slow, & not worried about big groups at alllll

Avatar
Shawn 2y ago

The command line program might be the better version for now.

https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplex-chat/blob/stable/docs/CLI.md

Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2y ago

I might just fuck around n try ittt but I don’t think I’ll get 80 ppl in there again bc nobody likes terminals hahaah

Avatar
Shawn 2y ago

Oh, definitely not for groups. πŸ˜…

Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2y ago

🀣🀣🀣 we need something for groups that’s not telegram or anything like that

Avatar
Shawn 2y ago

The struggle is real.

Avatar
signal_and_rage 2y ago

jack sent it to nostr, Twitter, and Bluesky

so they probably weren’t ready for all the traffic

groups designed to only do hundreds, not thousands

but cool to have if TG, WA, Signal aren’t good options

Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2y ago

85 ppl in a group and sooooooo many issues

Avatar
signal_and_rage 2y ago

🫑

Avatar
Bozkytoken 2y ago

🐡🐡