I am open to being corrected or refuted about this view:

I approach Libertarianism the same way I approach Bitcoin and Hinduism.

In their proper sense,

•They can only be adopted voluntarily.

•People are free to not believe in them, as exit is optional.

•There's no leader that is enforcing rules.

•They can be interpreted in various ways.

•But the systems don't deny the existence of 'truth'.

•Truth is arrived at through debate, discussion and argumentation in various ways through different journeys.

But because of their open and leaderless nature, people who don't understand them can interpret them 'improperly' or 'incorrectly' and still call themselves a proponent of the system.

And that's okay.

It won't hurt the system itself in any way.